I want to create a NAS for my family at home. I am already pretty sure about using TrueNAS as software, but the hardware is still open.

What hardware do you recommend for 2TB of usable Storage (+a second drive for mirroring the first one) that is used by 3 people for pictures, videos, and documents?

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Maybe you could pickup a old workstation and drop a few drives in it. It is fairly affordable and would allow you to get your feet wet. For ZFS you really want lots of ram so make sure you get enough.

    How are you going to mount the storage? Do you need some sort of shared authentication? I personally would either use software Nextcloud or Synching or an active directory deployment via Samba.

  • Xanza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I really like my Synology NAS, but if I had to do it again, I would roll my own with one of the Mini-PC’s from Amazon. They’re essentially just as expensive as the Synology hardware and you can make due by installing Rockstor or something similar. You won’t get the same experience as the Synology setup, but IMO it’s not really worth the underpowered hardware. I would much rather have something significantly more powerful like the Mini-PC to be able to run containers on without having to worry about system resources.

  • natch@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    2TB is insanely small for a NAS. At that point, you could honestly just run a Pi 5 with M.2 HAT and a 2TB SSD for something like $200 total. Could always buy a second Pi for mirroring and even locate it in a friend or family member’s house for mirroring and backup.

    I use a Pi 4 with 7 TB of external SSDs just fine at home. It also hosts a pi.hole ad blocking server, my 1TBish jellyfin music streaming collection, my network share for kodi, an always-on VPN for my phone and laptops, and a few other small services. I’m sure I could upgrade for better read/write speeds. But everything is performant enough as is, and it’s completely silent and fan-free in my living room by the router. Honestly for most services a Pi with a passive cooler will perform admirably.

      • natch@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Of course, nothing wrong with it. In fact it makes OP’s quandary a lot easier! I’m looking into something with 20TB or so of capacity myself, and that’s given me an appreciation for how much simpler it is to solve this problem at 2TB.

  • cerofrio@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have a UGreen NAS (6800 Pro) and the hardware on it has been great. I added a new system drive and have been running Proxmox since day 1.

    The install process would be the same, enter bios, enable boot from other drive, disable UGreen OS drive, and then reboot to install whatever OS you want.

    NASCompares did a video review of the UGreen NAS with TrueNAS installed and had nothing but good things to say.

    I got mine during the Kickstarter campaign, but I still think they have some good value at retail vs competitors.

    I’ve owned QNAP and Synology, the one area that has been an issue has been around the CPU being the bottleneck and slowing down transfers. This was on the lower end models.

  • april@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Probably just go with SSD storage because 2T is fairly low for hard drives these days. Still a pretty good idea to do a mirror.

    Pretty much any CPU that isn’t a raspberry pi will comfortably max out a gigabit Ethernet connection.

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        100x ? Did you sleep for 15 years?

        A 2tb SATA SSD has a comparable price to a 4tb SATA HDD.

        If it wasn’t for the Al bubble the prices would be even lower

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          And a 4tb SSD is the same price as a 16tb HDD.

          If that trend continues, when you get to a 100tb of SSD(s) the equivalently priced HDD(s) will have 100x the capacity.

          • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            4x is way far compared to 100x

            the only case where hdds have a 100x ratio, is where apple scams their customers offering a 256gb upgrade for $200: it means $800 per terabyte (this price was a scam even 15 years ago), and a $500 18tb HDD is 100x “apple platinum grade ssd”